When
scientists seem to be on a constant quest to mechanize and automate
every step of the human life, there are many organizations that try
to put in place remuneration programs based on the performance of
employees. But unfortunately, several companies have failed in their
efforts. At the same time, we cannot be oblivious of the fact that an
invisible factor seems to be working for some companies that have
succeeded in implementing such a program. So, the question is why
some companies could succeed in implementing this program and why
other companies have not met with success.
Researches
done by experts have revealed that the success of a performance basedpay system depends upon a number of factors, the
prominent among them is the commitment of employees to the
organization. Secondly, what the organization expects from the
employees and what the employees expect from the management may also
play key a role in implementing this program successfully. Though a
number of other factors may also influence the success of a
performance based pay program, let us now look at some of these
factors.
1.
Employee Commitment
Surprisingly,
researches reveal that performance based pay programs work well in
organizations wherein the commitment of the employees towards their
companies is low. On the other hand, in companies where the
commitment level of the employees is high, the program does not seem
to work. It has been observed that in companies with employees with
low commitment levels, workers view a performance based pay structure as an excellent opportunity for getting additional income by
performing better than how they normally perform.
On
the other hand, the scenario is different in organizations where the
commitment level of the employees is high. Employees of these
companies generally work very hard and they ensure to meet deadlines
also. So, performance based pay or incentive programs may be
unnecessary expenses in these companies. In fact, employees of these
companies may even view the introduction of such programs as an
insult to their commitment.
2.
Temporary programs may be successful
If
organizations put in place a performance based incentive program
purely on a temporary basis, they may achieve success. Researchers
have found that employees are capable of adjusting to long-term,
ongoing programs. Once they get the taste of the increased pay due to
a performance based incentive program, they may feel that injustice
is being meted out to them when the management withdraws the program.
This may negatively impact their morale as well as their performance.
Even Michael Beer and Mark Cannon, renowned business researchers,
opine “A workforce that always expects additional pay for
additional progress can become a liability.”
On
the contrary, if employees are offered a performance based incentive
occasionally, they may view it only as a bonus and not as a
guaranteed payment.
There
is another danger also in performance based pay programs. For
example, if there are two equally efficient employees, one of them
may hoard vital information and get a performance based incentive.
Since the other employee does not have the vital information, he may
not get the incentive. This may lead to a situation in which the
management may be rewarding knowledge hoarding whereas any company
may generally wish to encourage knowledge sharing among the
employees.
3.
What the employees expect from the organizations and what the
management expects from the employees
There
should be complete synergy between what the management expects from
its employees and what employees are willing to offer. But such a
synergy pivots on proper communication between the employees and the
management. In other words, proper communication alone can help in
achieving success in implementing a performance based pay program.
Employees should have clear knowledge of the details like why the
program is being implemented, how long it will stay, the ease or
difficulty with which they can get the incentives and whether
external factors may impact the evaluation process of the program. If
employees do not have complete knowledge of these details, there may
be all-round chaos in the organization and the program is bound to
fail. Most importantly, the program the management introduces should
be fair not only to the organization but to the employees as well.
4.
Costs of implementing the program vis a vis its benefits
Companies
should neither over-estimate nor under-estimate the benefits they can
derive by putting in place a performance based pay program. They must
not forget that they will incur considerable expenses in implementing
the program. This means the benefits they get should outweigh the
costs of implementing it.
Conclusion
Implementation
of a performance based pay program may not be as easy as companies
think. It is better if organizations analyze all the factors
thoroughly before deciding to put a program in place.
No comments:
Post a Comment